Should Medicaid Pay for Abortion

Should Medicaid ease up for spontaneous miscarriage? This is a in truth touchy issuing and angiotensin converting enzyme that has been in the newspapers for months now. It is to a fault the main sympathy that the passing of the historic wellness was postp iodined for the amount of time that it was. I think that take down so though miscarriage is a touchy subject and won that has been a main topic since hard roe vs. Wade in 1973, I think that is a very important topic and one that entrust always be discussed for much much time. I think that miscarriage should be legal and be the abateing of the parties involved to name the decision on whether to watch one or not.Also, I gestate think that miscarriage should be c ar fored by the tax payers in the case o rapine or incest because both of those instances could result in a very tough aliveness for the baby. Either the tike go forth be hated by its amaze because every day she sorts at him/her it reminds her of her rapi st, or the kidskin is born with birth defects. To thoroughly make a good decision on where you stand with the abortion topic, I think that you must first regard out what abortion actu in every toldy is.miscarriage is the induced barrier of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus, any of various parts resulting in the termination of a pregnancy, cessation of normal growth, especially of an organ or otherwise body part, prior to full phylogenesis or maturation, and the premature ending or abandonment of an down the stairstaking. Abortion procedures include manual vacuum inspiration and dilation and suction curettage, both of which mess be performed in early pregnancy.The complaisant acceptability of abortion as a means of population comptroller has varied from time to time and quad to place throughout history. It was apparently a common system of family limitation in the Greco-Roman world, but Christian theologians early and vehemently condemned it. It bec ame widely accepted in Europe in the middle Ages. Severe twist sanctions to deter abortion became common in the nineteenth century, but in the 20th century those sanctions were gradually modified in many countries. In the U. S. the 1973 hard roe v.Wade decision had the effect of legalizing abortion during the first terce months of pregnancy states were able to implement restrictions on approach to abortion afterwards the first trimester, though in spite of appearance constraints set by the courts. Since that decision, thither has been a barbarian debate between supporters and opponents of a liberalized abortion policy. As you see this is aroundthing that has been debated for centuries upon centuries. I prevail read many articals on abortion and how the procedure is actually conducted.The procedure seems to be very grue rough, that is why I fag end to a lower placestand why some deal deal rep. baronet Stupak are diehard pro-life supporters. If you can recall Bart Stupak who is a senator from Michigan (our know conductge state) was the democrat who along with twelve other pro-life democrats held up the passing of the health sustainment bill with his votes until professorship Obama agreed to sign an executive order stating that government financial backing will not go to sweep version abortion in this new health thrill bill. After words Stupak said We stood strong, said Stupak. We stood on a principle. Stupaks argument really goes all the way back to hard roe v. Wade. After Roe v. Wade decriminalized abortion in 1973, Medicaid over- conciliateed abortion cautiousness without restriction. In 1976, Representative Henry Hyde (R-IL) introduced an amendment that subsequently passed to limit federal funding for abortion care. effectual in 1977, this supplying, known as the Hyde Amendment, specifies what abortion function are turn toed under Medicaid. Over the quondam(prenominal) two decades, Congress has debated the limited circumstances u nder which federal funding for abortion should be allowed.For a brief period of time, get acrossage included cases of cocker, incest, life endangerment, and physical health damage to the woman. However, beginning in 1979, the physical health exception was excluded, and in 1981 profane and incest exceptions were also excluded. In September 1993, Congress rewrote the provision to include Medicaid funding for abortions in cases where the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. The present version of the Hyde Amendment requires coverage of abortion in cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment. The first challenges to the Hyde Amendment came shortly after its implementation.The Supreme Court has held that the Hyde Amendment restrictions are constitutional and that states act in Medicaid are only required to cover abortion services for which they receive federal funding rather than all medically necessary abortions. Challenges under state constitutions have been more successful. Se veral lawsuits have been brought in individual states arguing that state constitutions pass on greater rampart for privacy and equal protection than the federal Constitution. The Hyde Amendment affects only federal spending. severalizes are fire to use heir own funds to cover additional abortion services. For example, Hawaii, refreshful York, and Washington have enacted laws funding abortions for health reasons. Other states, such as Maryland, cover abortions for women whose pregnancies are affected by foetal abnormalities or present serious health risks. These expansions are important steps toward ensuring equal access to health care for all women. Prior to the 1993 expansion of the Hyde Amendment, thirty states chose not to use their own Medicaid funds to cover abortions for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest.Initially, a number of states verbalised resistance to comply with the expanded Hyde Amendment, and presently long dozen states are under court orders to compl y and cover rape and incest in addition to life endangerment. every(prenominal) court that has considered the Hyde Amendments application to a states Medicaid program since 1993 has held that states go along to participate in the Medicaid program must cover abortions resulting from rape or incest in order to be compliant with the Hyde Amendment, regardless of state laws that may be more restrictive. Federal funding has been covering abortion for historic period and according to the Hyde Amendment it covers incest and rape. My research has also led me to see that Michigan is one of twenty cardinal states that receive funding under the Hyde Amendment. This means that one of the states that use federal funding for abortion in special cases has the main representative that is arguing that lay claim system. This is kind of ironic to me. If the federal funding is there and actually has been there for seventeen years what the read/write head of arguing the bill that will eventually observe the government property.I have found some provoke information that if looked at maybe by some of our political leaders they would not cause such a galactic fuss like Stupak and some other perfect conservatives like Sarah Palin about a the health care bill that not only is in the outmatch interest of the people but also the go around interest of the government in terms of the budget but also the insurance companies who now will have more policies out there to require in more revenue. Here are some interesting facts that I found about what event of women have abortions and why. Women with family incomes less than $15,000 secure 28. 7% of all abortions Women with family incomes between $15,000 and $29,999 obtain 19. 5% Women with family incomes between $30,000 and $59,999 obtain 38. 0%Women with family incomes over $60,000 obtain 13. 8%. The reason women have abortion are as follows, 1% of all abortions occur because of rape or incest 6% of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the generate or pincer, and 93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i. e. he child is unwanted or inconvenient). So why not allow the health care bill to cover abortion? If the bill is basically scantily departure to keep the Hyde Amendment rule in place or maybe take it some other(prenominal) step forward and require police reports on alleged rapes and incest it really will not make a difference. If only one percent of all abortion are due to rape or incest, that amount of spending will not even dent the federal funding. I think more money is spent by politicians on their reclusive jets that take all over the get together States just to make appearances.While abortion remains perhaps the close contentious issue in American politics, what is one persons principled stand is anothers crime against humanity. Abortion is a decision that should be made by the person qualifying through the process not some politician from Texas for example who lives in a ten kibibyte square foot home and makes probably a million dollar bills a year after blossom backs. Also if the system of states covering under the correct circumstances has been working for almost twenty years then I say why careen it.Many times people let their emotions and personal whimsey make their decisions when all they have do is draw themselves in the position of the women who was raped, or the male is out of the picture and the mother will not be able to financially support a child and the child might end up in a dumpster, in the street or live in foster homes its whole life. I look at this way and Im going to state a question to some of these people who think federal funding should not pay for this. Financially speaking as a nation, Is it financially better to cover a $500 dollar procedure once or pay for Medicare, housing, and sustenance for eighteen years?From doing the basic math I think the $500 is a lot cheaper. The United States is a business. And just like any other business it needs money to survive. To maintain that money it has a budget, and that budget at this point is in a major deficit. This bill will unbosom trillions of dollars over the next fifteen years opine how much more money they could save all states allowed the lower income poverty striking women to have abortion under the state insurance, trillions more would be saved. fundamental math is the key to answering this, in the end its all business.WORK CITED 1. Gregg Cunningham, WHY ABORTION IS GENOCIDE spend 2000 2. AMERICAN GOVERNMENT TEXT BOOK 3. Megan Carpentier, Bart Stupak is no healthcare hero (march 22, 2010) 4. Peter Roff, The abutting healthcare Reform Fight Make the Abortion Executive Order Law (March 24, 2010) Pr 5. Steven Ertelt , New Catholic Bishops Memo Abortion in wellness Care Despite Obama Order (March 30, 2010) 6. Tres Sugar, Congress Debates Whether health Care Should Cover Abortion (07/09/2009) 7. Angela Blair, Obamas Healthcare bear down Requires All Americans to Pay For Abortions (3/7/2010) 8. The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, Medicaids office for Women. Issue Briefs An update on Womens Health Policy (November 2004). 9. The Guttmacher Institute, State Funding of Abortion under(a) Medicaid. State Policies in Brief (June 1, 2005). 2 . American government page 102 3 . www. abortion. com 4 . www. csmonitor. com 5 . The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation, Medicaids Role for Women. Issue Briefs An Update on Womens Health Policy (November 2004). 6 . The Guttmacher Institute, State Funding of Abortion Under Medicaid. State Policies in Brief (June 1, 2005). 7 . www. abortionno. org 8 . www. abortionno. org